It’s funny to look back in time and determine where people stood on issues 20, 50 or 200 years ago and then compare the modern day stances on the same issues. Societal changes, shifting demographics and changes in technology and the ramifications of these changes rippling through society as a whole, sometimes leave me surprised and confused.
Let’s talk about the latest battleground forming in our nation today; The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Until just a few short years ago, guns in society were rarely considered. It was just assumed that most people had guns and knew how to use them. I grew up with guns in our home. It was no big deal. My father taught my brother and me how to properly use a gun, care for it, and ABOVE ALL, respect it. I personally took a 12 gauge shotgun to school for use in a school play and actually shot it (with the metal shot removed from the shells of course) during the play! Guess what? No one was surprised and no one even checked my shells to verify they were empty. In that era, even adults placed faith in 17 year olds that they were being responsible with weapons.
Until 40 or 50 years ago, guns were a primary means in putting food on tables in a majority of homes in America. Guns were tools that were used responsibly, for the most part. Once again, they were no big deal.
Now, it seems, guns ARE a big deal. Why? Because some crackpot idiot decided to STEAL guns and massacre 20 children and 8 adults in the most recent act of craziness. It’s not JUST Newtown, CT. Its Columbine, Jonesboro, Aurora, etc., as well as Tyrifjorden Buskerud, Norway, Baku, Azerbaijan and Dunblane, Scotland. If you think crazy is limited to America, then you are nuts as well.
You might think that this is the reason that gun control is all you hear about on the news these days. Well, it’s not. I have news for you. These “crazies” would have killed people with a knife, ball bat or a damn rock if that is what they could get their hand on. The reason that our Federal Government is so up in arms over guns is simple….control…
I hear people say that we need to ban “military STYLE assault rifles”. Why? Because they LOOK like an automatic weapon. Guess what? They are NOT automatic weapons. Honestly, you can do as much damage with your Dad’s 30.06 deer rifle as you can with a Bushmaster XM 15 rifle. It might take you an extra 3-4 seconds to change out the clips since they hold only 5 rounds, but I can carry 20 to 30 full clips with no problem whatsoever. All this talk about limiting clips to 10 rounds or less is no more than political scare tactics.
It’s about time that our elected officials start talking about the REAL meaning of the 2nd Amendment and quit all the beating around the bush. They act like stating a fact is treason. The simple truth is that the 2nd Amendment authorizes We The People to protect ourselves and our country from a tyrannical government…end of story. It does not mention or even allude to hunting or self-defense from other citizens. You see, our Founding Fathers were not worried about hunting….that was a daily chore. They were not worried about self-defense from other citizens…they all had guns and most of them were responsible and trustworthy citizens. Our Founding Fathers were fighting a war of independence from a TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT! The BRITISH! GET IT PEOPLE?????? These men, in their infinite wisdom, saw fit to delineate a physical object (the ONLY physical object listed in our Bill of Rights) as the ONE tangible object REQUIRED to overthrow a tyrannical government! ARMS……
Now, if you consider the 2nd Amendment in this light, what makes you think that our Founding Fathers would even consider allowing the People to be armed with weapons that do not even come close to matching the weaponry that the government possesses? They would not. That would be like saying, “Well, the British have flintlock rifles, so we need to fight our battles against them with the bow and arrow”! Now, exactly how much sense does that make? None whatsoever! That would be a totally stupid statement to make, and even an idiot should realize it.
Our Federal Government has NO right under the Constitution to limit the people’s access to weapons and has even less of a mandate to know WHO possess these arms!
It is impossible to overthrow a tyrannical government with sub-standard weapons. It is also foolish of the People to inform the same government as to who owns weapons that could be used in overthrowing it.
Does this now make sense to everyone?
Alas, probably not… I understand that Progressives will, for some reason, disagree with even the simplest of arguments. Just as they cannot usually see that lower tax rates generate MORE taxes in the long run, they will refuse to see that our Founders foresaw that, at some point, the People MAY have to resort to putting its own Federal government back in line.
If, for any reason, you don’t believe the obvious, PLEASE consult an expert. I can tell you who the experts are that can give you first-hand information regarding banning guns and documented gun ownership…
Ask a Russian…ask a Chinese…ask a North Korean…maybe a German!
In the grand scheme, it should not be a question of WHAT kind of arms I can own. The answer should be anything I can afford.
I’m finished now…. I have to get back to work to make the next payment on my Tomahawk Missile.
Chatter Now Decoded.
xxx
GBB